Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ticketbleed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:05, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ticketbleed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Fails WP:BASIC. Information is already supplied in the CVE database in much greater detail. Why does it need an entry in Wikipedia?

Are we going to have an new entry in Wikipedia every time an entry in the CVE database appears, effectively synchronizing to the two db's. No, we're not. I don't think it is notable. scope_creep (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 03:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage in reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 00:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.